SYMBOLIZATION OF MYTHICAL SPACE IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF ERNST CASSIRER

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.43.2

Keywords:

philosophy of culture, mythical space, symbol, symbolization, Ernst Cassirer, heterogeneity, “puzzle space”

Abstract

The purpose of the article is identification of the role of the symbol in the process of philosophical understanding of the structures of mythical space by the outstanding German philosopher of the 20th century, Ernst Cassirer, and analysis of the features of symbolization of mythical space in the concept of Cassirer. Methodological principles of the study are philosophical reflection, phenomenological approach, historical and philosophical analysis of primary sources, comparative analysis, systematization. Scientific novelty. The role of the symbol as an integrating and constitutive factor in the process of constructing the structures of the mythical space was clarified. The analysis of myth as a specific symbolic form and “space of myth” in E. Cassirer's “The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms” is covered in the context of the development of the European philosophical tradition. The main features of the mythical space in E. Cassirer's concept (unity of “place” and “content”, clearly expressed structure, heterogeneity, delimitation of sacred and profane localities) are singled out and considered. The structure of the symbolic space of myth in E. Cassirer is characterized as a kind of “puzzle” spatial structures. Conclusion. In the cultural and philosophical analysis of mythical space, Ernst Cassirer clearly showed how the symbol performs its main functions: the function of combination (by symbolizing different localities and directions), the function of delimitation (by fixing for each place its inherent symbolic content), the function of structuring, the function of marking and distinguishing sacred and profane meanings, the function of mediator between feelings and human thinking (for example, the symbolism of heterogeneity). Any mythical space has been symbolized as a “puzzle structure” because the space of the myth is heterogeneous, fragmentary, enigmatic (that is, one that contains a mystery, a mystical experience of a particular community or humanity as a whole).

References

Замятин Д.Н. Геокультура и процессы межцивилизационной адаптации: стратегии репрезентации и интерпретации ключевых культурно-географических образов. Цивилизация. Восхождение и слом / отв. ред. Э.В. Сайко. Москва : Наука, 2003. С. 222–234.

Некита А.Г., Мухина М.В. Мифологизация сакрального пространства дома в американских фильмах ужасов. Учёные записки Новгородского государственного университета имени Ярослава Мудрого. 2020. № 8 (33). URL: https://www.novsu.ru/univer/press/eNotes1/i.1086055/?id=1450150.

Рощенко О.Г. Символіка Монсальвату і Валгалли у музичній драматургії оперного міфу Р. Вагнера «Лоенгрін». Вісник Нац. академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. Серія «Мистецтвознавствo». 2019. № 3. С. 166–171.

Слюсар М.В. Міфічне та міфізація в медіапросторі і рекламі: теоретико-методологічні проблеми. Українська полоністика. 2018. № 15. С. 76–84.

Baumann Ch. Kant, Neo-Kantians, and Transcendental Subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 25. Issue 3. Р. 595–616.

Borodenko O. The problem of the local in philosophical tradition and in modern philosophy of culture. Актуальні проблеми філософії та соціології. 2020. № 27. С. 3–7. URL: https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i27.911.

Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 1: Language / trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven/London : Yale Univ. Press, 1955a.

Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 2: Mythical Thought / trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven / London : Yale Univ. Press, 1955b.

Cook E.F. The Philosophy of Mythology. Leiden : Brill, 2016.

Hübner K. Die Wahrheit des Mythos. Freiburg : Verlag Alber, 2011.

Imhof S. Kulturelle Selbstbeschreibung. Bildungsperspektiven eines Spannungsverhältnisses. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2016.

Levi-Strauss C. Structural Anthropology. New York : Basic Books, 1963. 412 p.

Makkreel R. Cassirer, Langer, and Dilthey on the Distinctive Kinds of Symbolism in the Arts. Journal of Transcendental Philosophy. 2021. № 2 (1) P. 7–20. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2019-0023.

Matherne S. Cassirer [1st edition]. London : Routledge, 2021.

Moss G.S. Ernst Cassirer and the Autonomy of Language. Lanham, Md. : Lexington Books, 2015.

Verene D. Foreword. Cassirer E. The Logic of the Cultural Sciences. New Haven : Yale University Press, 2000. P. vii–ix.

Published

2021-11-29