ECO-SPINOZISM AS A CURRENT CONTEXT FOR THE BENEDICT SPINOZA METAPHYSICS’

Authors

  • Oleh Bohun Ivan Franko Lviv National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.38.186109

Keywords:

ecology; spinozism; matter; consciousness; affect; anthropocentrism

Abstract

Purpose. The article aims to identify the productive value of the Dutch thinker Benedict Spinoza’s heritage in finding out and solving the problems facing modern eco-philosophy. Methodology. The article uses analytical and synthetic methods, which assume the disclosure of metaphysical concepts in modern eco-philosophical con-texts and actualization of classical ontology in building a new type of relationship between the man and nature. Scientific novelty. The article asserts that environmental pollution and complexity of building new types of coexistence between the man and other living and non-living organisms require reformatting of habitual opposition between nature and the man, consciousness and matter, politics, aesthetics and history – in particular, in the direction of the original Spinoza’s ideas. The analysis of Spinoza’s influence in modern discourse also has a practical meaning. The fact that the human being is not metaphysically or politi-cally exclusive with unique thinking and not the only bearer of values (which in various forms are articulated by the theorists of eco-philosophy) is supported by the anti-modern ethics XVII century Dutch thinker. The practical meaning of the article is to reveal the principles of eco-activism and political struggle against environmental pollution and animal protection movement. Theoretical significance is in attracting the rationalistic metaphysics of Benedict Spinoza to the construction of the new non-anthropocentric ontologies by A. Naess, T. Morton, S. Shaviro, F. Guattari, G. Bateson and others. Conclusions. The need for changes in the way humans and other living organisms coexist to solve environmental problems is manifested in the search for new ethics and ontologies in philosophy. An important place is occupied by the rethinking of Spinoza’s idea in metaphysical, ethical and ontologi-cal aspects.

References

Димерець, Р. (2005). Концепція могутності (potentia) в метафізиці Бене-дикта Спінози. Sententiae, 12 (1), 3–22. Retrieved from: http://fgn. vntu.edu.ua/sent_12.htm#1.

Димерець, Р. (2006). Спінозівська концепція природної могутності (potentia) і трансформація поняття природи в натурфілософії XVI–XVII століть. (Дис. канд. філос. наук). Інститут філософії імені Г.С. Сковороди НАН України. Київ.

Ладыгина-Котс, Н. (1965). Предпосылки человеческого мышления. (Под-ражательное конструирование обезьяной и детьми). Москва.

Половцова, В. (1913). К методологии изучения философии Спинозы. Вопросы философии и психологии, 118, 331–333.

Хайдеггер, М. (1993). Европейский нигилизм. Время и бытие (с. 63–176). Москва: Республика.

Citton, Y., & Lordon, F. (2010). Spinoza et les sciences sociales: De la puissance de la multitude l conomie des affects. Paris: Editions Amsterdam.

Dahlbeck, M.D.L. (2019). Spinoza, ecology and international law radical naturalism in the face of the anthropocene. Abingdon, Oxon: Rout-ledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315177267.

Deleuze, G. (1968). Spinoza et le probleme de lexpression. Paris: Editions de minuit.

Deleuze, G. (2015). Spinoza: philosophie pratique. Paris: Les ditions de Minuit.

Ferret, S. (2011). Deepwater horizon thique de la nature et philosophie de la crise cologique. Paris: d. du Seuil.

Kettle, N.M. (2013). Climate, Neo-Spinozism, and the Ecological Worldview. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/view content.cgi?article=6104&context=etd.

Lee, D. (2013, December 13). The Secret Language of Plants. Quanta Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-secret-language-of-plants-20131216/

Morton, T. (2009). Ecology without nature: rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.

Morton, T. (2010). Guest Column: Queer Ecology. Pmla, 125 (2), 273–282. doi: 10.1632/pmla.2010.125.2.273.

Naess, A. (2005). Spinoza and the Deep Ecology Movement. The Selected Works of Arne Naess (рр. 2662–2687). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_121.

Sharp, H. (2011). Spinoza and the politics of renaturalization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226750750. 003.0001.

Spinoza, B. (2018a). CAPUT III. De iure summarum potestatum. Tractatus politicus. Retrieved from https://home.kpn.nl/rudolf.meijer/spinoza/ works.htm?lang=E.

Spinoza, B. (2018b). De bonis quae homines plerumque appetunt. Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione. Retrieved from https://home.kpn.nl/ru dolf.meijer/spinoza/works.htm?lang=E.

Spinoza, B. (2018c). Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata. Retrieved from https://home.kpn.nl/rudolf.meijer/spinoza/

Stephano, O. (2017). Spinoza, Ecology, and Immanent Ethics. Environ-mental Philosophy, 14 (2), 317–338. doi: 10.5840/envirophil201791855.

Vinciguerra, L. (2009). Spinoza in French Philosophy Today. Philosophy Today, 53 (4), 422–437. doi: 10.5840/philtoday200953410.

Published

2019-12-23