IMPLEMENTATION OF CHINESE MARXISM IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION PRACTICES OF THE "ONE BELT, ONE ROAD" INITIATIVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.49.14

Keywords:

«One Belt, One Road», Chineseized Marxism, intercultural communication, reforms and openness, building a community of a common destiny.

Abstract

Summary. The purpose of the article is to determine the features of the prognostic model of the implementation of Chinese Marxism in intercultural communication of the One Belt, One Road initiative. Research methodology. The theoretical and methodological basis of this study was the structuralfunctional and comparative approaches, as well as analyticaldescriptive, historical, comparative-typological, comparativecomparative methods, the method of rational reconstruction and methods of socio-cultural and problem-categorical analysis. Scientific novelty. In this research, a new contribution has been made to the illumination of a holistic systematic knowledge of the philosophical and political science foundations of a prognostic scientifically based model of implementation of Chineseized Marxism in intercultural communication of the Chinese initiative «One Belt, One Road». As a result of the study, it was established that the Chinese initiative «One Belt, One Road» became the largest project of the 21st century, the «New Silk Road», which became a sea and land corridor between the countries. China is a country in which the dominant ideology is Marxism. However, this is a special Marxism, the history of which has been adapting to Chinese realities for almost a century, combining the main principles of Marxism with the specifics and traditions of China. The historical process of the Chineseization of Marxism became a rather long process of promoting Marxist theories, based on extensive practice and immersion in Chinese society. Conclusions. It can be stated that the historical process of the Chineseization of Marxism and the «One Belt, One Road» initiative proposed by Xi Jinping are both theoretically and practically based on Marxism, in its Chinese interpretation, namely «Chineseized Marxism». Following Marxist theory, which should provide the theoretical background for the joint construction of the Belt and Road initiative, China continues to follow the chosen course and creatively develop Marxism, which corresponds to the chosen path of reform and opening up and the further construction of «socialism with Chinese characteristics for the new era».

References

1. 深刻领会习近平文化思想的丰富内涵 发表时间: 2024-01-11来源:人日 URL:https://hbepb.hebei.gov.cn/hbhjt/ztzl/zhuanti/hbssthjtjgdj/

ztsj/101704416533793.html

2. 马克思国际交往理论与“一带一路”倡议 作者:何喜均 来源:人民论坛网. (2017). URL: http://www.rmlt.com.cn/2017/ 1121/503707.shtml

3. 改革开放与马克思主义中国化 辛鸣 来源:学习时报. (2018). URL: http://www.qstheory.cn/2018-12/27/c_1123913901.htm

4. Rudenko S., Sobolievskyi Y., Changming Zhang. Feng Shui Cosmology and Philosophy in Native Americans’ Worldview. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2021. Volume 27. Р. 196-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/27/16

5. Sergii Rudenko, Iryna Liashenko. Chinese Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of the Soviet Period. STUDIA WARMIŃSKIE. 2020. No 57.

Р. 85-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.6007

6. Rudenko S., Changming Zhang. Pan Maoming’s Philosophy and Cosmology: a Historiographical Research on the Sources and Cultural

Background. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2020. No 25. Р. 163-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/25/14

7. Turenko, V. Philosophy and Historical Problematics in Soviet and ChineseMarxism: a Comparative Analysis. Ukrainian Policymaker. 2022.

Volume 10. P. 43-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/up/10/6

8. Rudenko S., Turenko V., Yarmolitska N., Petrenko I., Vilkov V., Horbatenko V. Philosophical and Anthropological Issues in Chinese Marxism:

Key Ideas and Concepts. Syensis. Universidade Católica de Petrópolis. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 2. P. 278-289. URL: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/%20article/ view/2544/3504 (Last accessed: 28.09.2024).

9. Vitalii Turenko, Nataliia Yarmolitska. Materialistic traditions in Chinese philosophy and their significance on the establishment of Marxism in China. The scientific paradigm in the context of technological development and social change: Scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia: «Baltija Publishing», 2023. Part 2. Р. 210-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-297-5-28

10. Rudenko S.V., Turenko V.E. Formation and development of the philosophical anthropology studies in Soviet Ukraine. Anthropological

Measurements of Philosophical Researchю 2019. No16, Р.143-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.188911

11. Кіктенко В.О. Україна в проекті «Один пояс, один шлях»: регіональний та глобальний виміри. Україна-Китай. 2018.

№13. С. 111-112. URL: https://sinologist.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ukraine-china-n13-2018.pdf (дата звернення: 28.09.2024).

12. Кіктенко В.О. «Один пояс, один шлях» – глобальний геоекономічний проект Китаю. Україна-Китай. 2017. № 2(8), С. 20-24. URL: https://sinologist.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ukrchina-2-8-2017-all.pdf (дата звернення: 28.09.2024).

13. 共建“一带一路”倡议:融通中国梦和世界梦的重大实践. 董 昊段红梅 (2023). 来源:光明日报. URL: http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2023/

1201/c40531-40129589.html

14. 李 展. 理论前沿 “一带一路”倡议与康德“永久和平论”:对话与超(2017). URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323951971.pdf

15. 王淑娟 “一带一路”人文交流的成就、挑战与前景 –《当代世界》2023年03期. URL: https://www.cdclib.org/libmag/detail.htm?i=3356&n=139&t=2

16. “一带一路”框架内的人文合作:成就与前景 来源:《欧亚经济》作者:孙壮志:2023-03-23. URL: https://www.ydylcn.com/zjgd/341989.

shtml

17. 开辟马克思主义中国化时代化新境界. 作者: 林振义 来源: 人民日报. 发布时间. (2023). URL: https://www.china-sorsa.org/detailpage/djyd-

937d4513-733c-41f6-9ae6-b86016177895.html

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

YARMOLITSKA, N. (2024). IMPLEMENTATION OF CHINESE MARXISM IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION PRACTICES OF THE "ONE BELT, ONE ROAD" INITIATIVE. Human Studies: A Collection of Scientific Articles of the Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series of Philosophy, (49), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.49.14