CONCEPTUAL ART: ART AFTER PHILOSOPHY OR ART AS PHILOSOPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.47.6Keywords:
concept, conceptual art, idea, philosophizing, Joseph Kosuth.Abstract
Summary. The purpose of the work is to understand the phenomenon of conceptual art, which is considered as visual philosophizing. For artists of conceptual art, it is not the form that is important, but the concept it expresses, because conceptual art seeks to influence the intellectual, not just the emotional or aesthetic perception of the viewer. Methodology. The posed problem involves the use of methods of hermeneutic understanding, applied not only to ideological and conceptual material, but also to the phenomena of art. When working with the texts, the author followed the method of phenomenological description, which follows the subject itself and makes it possible to realize a conceptualized understanding of the set goal. Scientific novelty. The author argues that conceptual art is a way of philosophizing: conceptual artists enter the dimension of philosophy by creating concepts in order to understand the world. As a result, they undermine the established ideas of what art should look like, asking questions about the essence of art in general. For conceptualism, the concept is more important than the artistic embodiment, and they set the philosophical task of awakening reflection. The desire to objectify and comprehend a concept brings the work of conceptual artists closer to philosophy, as it provokes the viewer to intellectually comprehend what they see, which is the work of philosophical reflection in the dimension of art. In this context, it would be unfair to say that classical art is limited to emotional impact, while the specificity of conceptual art is that it purposefully sets out to go beyond art as such. Conclusions. Conceptual art is not just related to philosophy, but it is a specific form of philosophizing, because the idea of conceptual art is aimed at intellectual contemplation, like some philosophical theory. Like philosophy, conceptual art aims to think about something that is beyond human sensory experience, and for this purpose both philosophy and conceptual art create concepts that can be used to think about the world around us, man in the world, history, ecology, etc.
References
1. Аккаш О. Українське візуальне мистецтво та можливості концептуалізації сучасності. Сучасне мистецтво. 2016. Вип. 12. С. 31–42.
2. Зайченко О.В. Поняття «концепт», його загальна характеристика. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія»: сер.: Філологія. Вип. 24. С. 78–81. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Nznuoaf_2012_24_27
3. Костюк О.П. Концептуальне мистецтво у дизайні. Мистецтвознавчі записки: зб. наук. праць. 2021. Вип. 40. С. 15–21.
4. Смирна Л. Століття нонконформізму в українському візуальному мистецтві. Фенікс. Київ, 2017. 452 с.
5. Ставчук Н.В. Концепт як базове поняття когнітивної лінгвістики. 2018. URL: https://dspace.udpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/12373/1/ KONTSEPT_%20YAK_BAZOVE%20PONYATTY_%20KOHNITIVN_YI_ LINHVISTYKY.pdf
6. Таценко Н.В. «Концепт» як ключове поняття когнітивної лінгвістики. Вісник Сумського державного університету. Сер. Філологія. 2008. №1. С. 105–110.
7. Brun Baptiste. Contemporary Art and Anthropology: Shared Experiences. Critique d'art. 2017. № 49. Рр. 35–45. URL: https://journalsopenedition- org.translate.goog/critiquedart/27139?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_ tl=ru&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=sc#quotation
8. Carroll K., Murawski M. & SHipley J. The Art of Dissident Domesticity: Julian Assange, King Prempeh, and Ethnographic Conceptualism in the Prison House. Social Text. 2017. Vol. 35. №. 4. Рp. 113–152. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1215/01642472-4223417
9. Deleuze G., Guattari F. What is philosophy?. Columbia University Press, 1994. 253 р.
10. Flynt Henry. Essay: concept art. An Anthology of Chance Operations. La Monte Young, editor. 1963. URL: https://henryflynt.org/aesthetics/ conart.html
11. Foster Hal. The return of the real : the avant-garde at the end of the century. The mit Рress Cambridge, 1996. 299 р.
12. Kosuth Joseph. Art After Philosophy. Studio International. 1969. URL: https://www.ubu.com/papers/kosuth_philosophy.html
13. LeWitt Sol. Paragraphs on Conceptual Art. Artforum. 1967. № 5:10. Рp. 79–84. URL: http://radicalart.info/concept/LeWitt/paragraphs.html 14. Martínez Francisco. When Contemporary Art Flirts with Anthropology... 26/04/2016. URL: https://arterritory.com/en/visual_arts/articles/16195-when_ contemporary_art_flirts_with_anthropology/
15. Marxen Eva. Artistic Practices and the Artistic Dispositif. A Critical Review. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología. 2018. № 33: 37–60.
16. Pröpper M.H. Sustainability science as if the world mattered sketching an art contribution by comparison. Ecology and Society. 2017. 22(3):31. DOI: httpsdoi.org10.5751ES-09359-220331. URL: https://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol22/iss3/art31/
17. Sansi Roger. Art. The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology. edited by Felix Stein. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. 2022. URL: https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/art DOI: http://doi.org/ 10.29164/22art
18. Sauer Jennifer. The Language of Art: An Interview with Joseph Kosuth. Art Dependence magazine. June 6, 2018. URL: https://www.artdependence. com/articles/the-language-of-art-an-interview-with-joseph-kosuth/
19. Ssorin-Chaikov N. Rethinking performativity: ethnographic conceptualism. Journal of Cultural Economy. 2020. Volume 13. Issue 6. Рр. 672–689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.20 19.1708779 URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/ 17530350.2019.1708779
20. Ugochukwu-Smooth C. Nzewi. Anthropology as practice: Artists of Africa and the ethnographic field in contemporary art. Alternative Art and Anthropology Global Encounters. Arnd Schneider (ed). Bloomsbury Academic. 2017. Рр. 27–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474231282.ч-001
21. Weidler Markus. Kristeva’s Thought Specular: Aesthetic Disobedience as a New Form of Revolt. The Southern journal of philosophy. 2020. № 58(3). Рр. 456–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12383