PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS OF STRESS REGULATION (PART ONE OF THE INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH)

Abstract

Summary. The purpose of the article is to analyze the questionnaire survey of the participants of the online course on managing stress states, which is dedicated to the study of the correlation between the mental life phenomena and the morphological, functional, and organizational aspects of integrity. The task of the research is to find out the outline of different levels of integrity, which is (the outline) present in the feelings, perception and states of the future participants of ABSR online group course before the start of classes. To fulfill the above-mentioned task, a questionnaire with 17 questions was drawn up. The methodology of the interdisciplinary study includes: the procedure of surveying future participants of ABSR online group course; parametric comparison of the feelings, perception and states of respondents separately within each classification level of integrity (morphological, functional and organizational) at the first stage of the research, and cross-analysis of the above-mentioned levels of integrity in the mental life phenomena of our respondents: the feelings, perception, states at the second stage of the research. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the application of the cross-analysis method to clarify the contours of the lack of morphological, functional and organizational integrity in the formats of mental phenomena (feelings, perception, states) in order to find a philosophical toolkit to regulate a stressful state. Conclusions. It was found that the emergence of a stressful state can be predicted at the stage of limited sensitivity to the structure of integrity. It was revealed that the acquisition of new opportunities (a state of organizational integrity) depends more on the content of motivations, values, and worldviews than on the quality of feeling and perception of integrity. Selected state markers in the integrity structure. The content of mental work (work with blocks, settings, templates, values, self-criticism, mistrust) as a tool for managing a stressful state is defined. It was found that the process of understanding one's own values and linking one's motivations to improving interaction allows one to gain experience in the state of organizational integrity, which is guaranteed to protect against stress.