HUMAN PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN MODERN SOCIETY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.42.13

Keywords:

personality, society, existentialism, person, life, philosopher.

Abstract

Summary. The purpose of this paper is aimed at carrying out a comprehensive analysis of human personality development in civil society and identifying the factors which has an impact on this process. Methodological principles of the study. The author shows that there is a clear increase in the crisis and limit states of being in the modern society. This situation needs to be addressed immediately, because the 21st century is the stage of systemic transformation of society. Scientific and technological progress creates conditions for facilitating human life, information exchange, simplification of life, interesting leisure, and at the same time contributes to a number of contradictory in terms of improving the conditions of “achievements”: improvement of weapons systems, the process of etc. This led to the increasing spread of material and technical values and eventually led to the nomination “man of the 21st century”. Man has lost the balance between all components of his own life and rational reference points throughout the universe of human being. The author has determined that of all modern philosophical trends, existentialism is the closest to the real fate of the common man. Furthermore, existential philosophers are able to answer the questions that are of concern today. Scientific novelty. The author has proved the need to identify the factors which influence the development of the human personality in civil society of the 21st century. After all, a crisis society needs urgent overcoming of destructive phenomena in it, creation of space for personal selfrealization, return to the real process of life of those ideals which have been developed throughout the history of mankind and capable to exert a comprehensive influence on the spiritual and intellectual climate today. Conclusions. The article reflects that the existence is an important factor which determines the life of the person, his/her attitude to life and death, to his/her position in the world. This factor has a total impact on the internal state, person’s relation to reality, his/her behavior and self-esteem. 

References

1. Bazaluk O., Nezhyva O. Martin Heidegger and Fundamental Ontology. Annals of the University of Craiova. Philosophy series. Romania, 2016.

№ 38. P. 71–83.

2. Губин В., Некрасова Е. Философская антропология. Москва : ПЕР СЭ ; Сантк-Петербург : Университетская книга, 2000. 240 с.

3. José Ortega y Gasset. Holmes, Oliver, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford

University, 2017.

4. Jackson Michael. Lifeworlds: Essays in Existential Anthropology. University of Chicago Press, 2012. P. 325.

5. Jörg Ruhloff Humanismus, humanistische Bildung, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Pädagogik, hg. von Dietrich Benner et al. Weinheim, Basel : Beltz, 2004. S. 443–454.

6. Хміль В., Koрх O. Ідея особистого самовизначення у філософії просвітництва. Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень. 2017.

№ 11. С. 127–134. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105496.

7. Martin Heidegger and Karl Jaspers. The Heidegger – Jaspers Correspondence (1920–1963), Humanity Books. 2003.

8. Massey Heath The Origin of Time: Heidegger and Bergson. State University of New York Press, Albany, 2015. P. 271.

9. Nezhyva Olga. Future Ukrainian’s Image: modern vision. Philosophy & Cosmology. Kyiv, 2015. Vol. 14. P. 175–179.

10. Puntel, Lorenz, Being and God: A Systematic Approach in Confrontation with Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jean-Luc Marion, Evanston, IL : Northwestern University Press, 2012.

11. Rosado Haddock G.E. On Husserl’s Distinction between State of Affairs (Sachverhalt) and Situation of Affairs (Sachlage) /, Husserl Or Frege?: Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics : Haddock / C. Ortiz Hill, G.E. Rosado. Chicago : Open Court, 2000. P. 253–262.

12. Shusterman Richard. Philosophie als Lebenspraxis. Wege in den Pragmatismus / Richard Shusterman. Berlin : Akademie-Verlag, 2001. P. 267.

13. Stokes Patrick. The Naked Self: Kierkegaard and Personal Identity. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 2015.

14. Wittrock Bjorn. Social Theory and Global History: the Three Cultural Crystallizations. Thesis Eleven. 2001. № 65. P. 27–50.

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

NEZHYVA, O., & TESLENKO, N. (2025). HUMAN PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN MODERN SOCIETY. Human Studies: A Collection of Scientific Articles of the Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series of Philosophy, (42), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4700.42.13